TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Samsung 930QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics157% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive208% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemSamsung 930QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP930QED-KA2CA
Memory8.8 GB free of 16 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221004
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 21 '23 at 22:41
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 57.9
1-Core 152
2-Core 287
86% 166 Pts
4-Core 436
8-Core 699
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 920
57% 920 Pts
Poor: 78% ↑
This bench: 69.6%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 883A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
157% Outstanding
Lighting 235
Reflection 206
Parallax 211
191% 217 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 155
Splatting 137
130% 162 fps
Poor: 135% ↑
This bench: 157%
 Great: 158%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D CA03) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.47% Terrible
Lighting 10.3
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 11.7
8% 12.8 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 15.8
Splatting 12.3
12% 14.4 fps
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 9.47%
 Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1405 1493 1407 145 371 372 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 1,399
Write 926
Mixed 1,235
SusWrite 866
248% 1,107 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 67.2
222% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 819
DQ Write 546
DQ Mixed 716
525% 694 MB/s
Poor: 108% ↑
This bench: 208%
 Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LK7K7@BM-BGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (89th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 55.8
MC Write 50.3
MC Mixed 50
149% 52 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 23.3
73% 25.5 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 51% ↑
This bench: 132%
 Great: 138%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical 930QED Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 930QED

CPU
Core i7-1260PIntelBench 85%, 4,690 samples123x
Core i5-1240PIntelBench 83%, 2,059 samples30x
0000IntelBench 68%, 1 sample1x
GPU
Iris Xe GraphicsIntelBench 16%, 72,765 samples149x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia  $195Bench 71%, 428,800 samples3x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia  $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples1x
SSD
MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GBSamsungBench 165%, 1,221 samples93x
MZVLQ256HBJD-00B 256GBSamsungBench 152%, 710 samples34x
MZVLQ1T0HBLB-00B 1TBSamsungBench 205%, 395 samples8x
RAM
K3LK7K7@BM-BGCP 8x2GBSamsungBench 104%, 283 samples116x
8x1GBMicronBench 115%, 283 samples37x
LK7K7@BM-BGCP 8x2GBUnknownBench 24%, 1 sample1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback