Samsung 930QED

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemSamsung 930QED  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP930QED-KA2CA
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221004
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 18 '23 at 13:45
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1240P
U3E1, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
71.6% Very good
Memory 59.1
1-Core 160
2-Core 294
89% 171 Pts
4-Core 455
8-Core 630
68% 543 Pts
64-Core 934
58% 934 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 71.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 883A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.29
Performing below potential (77th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 226
Reflection 205
Parallax 208
184% 213 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 152
Splatting 135
128% 160 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Sanyo(144D CA03) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.3616
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Lighting 10.4
Reflection 16.5
Parallax 11.4
8% 12.8 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 14.4
Splatting 11.5
11% 13.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLQ512HBLU-00B 512GB
358GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7AK1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1280 1449 1488 304 243 346 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,216
Write 1,403
Mixed 1,163
SusWrite 852
261% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 58.7
200% 71.9 MB/s
DQ Read 810
DQ Write 541
DQ Mixed 702
517% 685 MB/s
Poor: 108%
This bench: 193%
Great: 218%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung K3LK7K7@BM-BGCP 8x2GB
8 of 8 slots used
16GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (90th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
132% Outstanding
MC Read 56.1
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 49.8
149% 52.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 39.4
SC Mixed 23.4
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 130
31% 130 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 132%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 930QED Builds (Compare 154 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Samsung 930QED

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback