Performance Results


Gaming 22% Surfboard	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 22% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	15.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	323% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Micro-Star MS-7C04
Motherboard	MSI MPG Z390I GAMING EDGE AC (MS-7C04) (all builds)
Memory	58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20221021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '23 at 19:32
Run Duration	137 Seconds
Run User	CAN-User
Background CPU	21%

PC Performing as expected (50^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-9900K-$403 354,223 User benchmarks, average bench 98% U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Memory 92 1-Core 143 2-Core 283 95% 173 Pts	4-Core 427 8-Core 740 71% 583 Pts	64-Core 1,199 74% 1,199 Pts
Poor: 89% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 104%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
AMD Radeon Pro WX 4100 929 User benchmarks, average bench 16% AMD(1002 0B0D) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1201 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.20.27.07 Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	15.2% Very poor	Lighting 17.2 Reflection 24.4 Parallax 28 14% 23.2 fps	MRender 23.7 Gravity 22.4 Splatting 19.3 18% 21.8 fps
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 19%
Intel UHD Graphics 630 65,338 User benchmarks, average bench 5% MSI(1462 7C04) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	6.33% Terrible	Lighting 6.2 Reflection 10.6 Parallax 9.3 5% 8.7 fps	MRender 11.9 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 12.3 9% 10.6 fps
Poor: 4% ↑ This bench: 6.33% Great: 7%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 2TB 9,880 User benchmarks, average bench 307% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0.00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 2047 2076 2062 2060 2043 2010 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	323% Outstanding	Read 2,187 Write 1,848 Mixed 2,006 SusWrite 2,050 456% 2,023 MB/s	4K Read 42.3 4K Write 131 4K Mixed 63.4 214% 78.8 MB/s	DQ Read 1,116 DQ Write 844 DQ Mixed 961 724% 974 MB/s
Poor: 113% ↑ This bench: 323% Great: 541%
WD Red 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$158 1,952 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 494GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 70 68 71 70 70 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	41.1% Average	Read 73.9 Write 90.2 Mixed 27.7 SusWrite 69.6 48% 65.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 73% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 62%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35 3,015 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 132GB free Firmware: 04.06A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 169 168 166 167 166 MB/s Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 176 Mixed 125 SusWrite 168 121% 164 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.6 335% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 111%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX CMK64GX4M2A2666C16 2x31.5GB 433 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2 of 4 slots used 63GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	83.2% Excellent	MC Read 30.6 MC Write 33 MC Mixed 25 84% 29.5 GB/s	SC Read 15.7 SC Write 34.5 SC Mixed 25.3 72% 25.2 GB/s	Latency 64 62% 64 ns
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 83.2% Great: 91%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 146%

UFO

Desktop 97%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 134%

UFO

GPU
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	195x
RTX 2080S (Super)Nvidia $466Bench 131%, 261,508 samples	146x
RTX 2080Nvidia $391Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	135x

SSD
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 217%, 80,540 samples	158x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	60x
PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsungBench 239%, 34,988 samples	51x

RAM
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 47%, 6,582 samples	179x
M378A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 87%, 6,612 samples	109x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	66x

Value: 89% - Excellent

Total price: $706

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16