Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-1620 0-$345 17,464 User benchmarks, average bench 70% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	74.2% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 99.6 2-Core 198 76% 130 Pts	4-Core 302 8-Core 498 49% 400 Pts	64-Core 496 31% 496 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 74.2% Great: 77%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35 3,015 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 110GB free (System drive) Firmware: 6A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 133 133 134 137 136 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	61.6% Good	Read 79.3 Write 126 Mixed 81.5 SusWrite 134 78% 105 MB/s	4K Read 1.6 4K Write 4.3 4K Mixed 1.2 280% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 61.6% Great: 111%
Kingston DT Elite G2 64GB 229 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 8GB free, PID 16d5 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 27 20 27 18 27 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	11.5% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 8 Mixed 15.7 SusWrite 22.9 24% 19.9 MB/s	4K Read 6.3 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 30% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung-00CE M393B5273DH0-YK0 4x4GB 528 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	94.5% Outstanding	MC Read 35.2 MC Write 40.1 MC Mixed 34.8 105% 36.7 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 14.4 SC Mixed 13.3 42% 14.8 GB/s	Latency 62.6 64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 94.5% Great: 99%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 13%

Tree trunk

Desktop 67%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 12%

Tree trunk

RAM
M393B5273DH0-CK0 4x4GBSamsung-00CEBench 85%, 1,049 samples	147x
HMT351R7CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynix-00ADBench 83%, 808 samples	130x
M393B1K70DH0-CK0 4x8GBSamsung-00CEBench 79%, 545 samples	73x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $373

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16