Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 55% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	69.7% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF (all builds)
Memory	13.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160831
Uptime	10.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '23 at 08:57
Run Duration	214 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	32%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6850K-$115 29,279 User benchmarks, average bench 84% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	79% Very good	Memory 88.1 1-Core 109 2-Core 205 77% 134 Pts	4-Core 377 8-Core 603 60% 490 Pts	64-Core 770 48% 770 Pts
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 79% Great: 93%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Zotac(19DA 2424) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (4^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	69.7% Good	Lighting 83.4 Reflection 99.3 Parallax 97.7 68% 93.5 fps	MRender 90.2 Gravity 87.8 Splatting 89.2 73% 89.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 69.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
HyperX Savage 960GB-$397 1,581 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 2GB free (System drive) Firmware: SAFM02.H Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 259 Write 366 Mixed 307 70% 310 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 20.8 76% 24.7 MB/s	DQ Read 308 DQ Write 83.9 DQ Mixed 114 105% 168 MB/s
Poor: 62% Great: 111%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 39GB free Firmware: RVQ02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 349 279 77 75 74 75 MB/s Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)	63.5% Good	Read 446 Write 398 Mixed 354 SusWrite 155 76% 338 MB/s	4K Read 26.4 4K Write 26.5 4K Mixed 24.7 86% 25.9 MB/s	DQ Read 372 DQ Write 62.2 DQ Mixed 106 106% 180 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 63.5% Great: 121%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 156 167 168 176 173 171 MB/s Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	95.6% Outstanding	Read 165 Write 153 Mixed 73.8 SusWrite 168 102% 140 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.8 159% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 95.6% Great: 96%
Seagate Desktop HDD 4TB (2013)-$49 67,711 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 180 186 178 176 MB/s Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 160 Write 146 Mixed 66.7 SusWrite 177 100% 137 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.7 138% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 96%
JMicron Generic DISK00 1.5TB 9 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 290GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.6 1.8 2.9 1.3 0.9 1.1 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	19.9% Very poor	Read 87.4 Write 86.6 Mixed 62.1 SusWrite 1.7 75% 59.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.2 4K Mixed 0.7 101% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 19.9% Great: 42%
JMicron Generic DISK01 160GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 102GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 60 59 63 61 62 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27.9% Poor	Read 60.7 Write 59.9 Mixed 45.8 SusWrite 60.3 77% 56.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.9 98% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27.9% Great: 28%
JMicron Generic DISK02 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 40% 929GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 61 63 62 65 63 64 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 110 Write 66.2 Mixed 72.1 SusWrite 62.9 99% 77.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.9 81% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 70%
JMicron Generic DISK03 80GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 13% 13GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.4 3.8 4.3 3.3 2.4 5.3 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12% Very poor	Read 49.9 Write 46.1 Mixed 35.7 SusWrite 4.1 43% 34 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 67% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 16%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 8 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	98.4% Outstanding	MC Read 35 MC Write 45.7 MC Mixed 34.2 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 12.3 SC Write 19.3 SC Mixed 17.7 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 69.4 58% 69.4 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98.4% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 88%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 79%

Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X99-Ultra Gaming-CF

CPU
Core i7-6800KIntel $103Bench 81%, 50,196 samples	140x
Core i7-6850KIntel $115Bench 84%, 29,279 samples	80x
Core i7-5820KIntel $130Bench 77%, 101,694 samples	45x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	54x
GTX 1070Nvidia $278Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	48x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $499Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	28x

SSD
990 Pro M.2 1TBSamsung $110Bench 402%, 34,940 samples	13x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	12x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $140Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	9x

RAM
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	14x
9965600-033.A00G 4x16GBUnknownBench 99%, 23 samples	9x
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $167Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $408

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359