Asrock X570M Pro4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 109% UFO	Desktop 85% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 112% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	130% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

Motherboard	Asrock X570M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	24.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200406
Uptime	1.4 Days
Run Date	Aug 28 '22 at 20:18
Run Duration	245 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	86.6% Excellent	Memory 72.3 1-Core 144 2-Core 281 89% 166 Pts	4-Core 541 8-Core 920 89% 730 Pts	64-Core 1,448 90% 1,448 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 86.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340 442,467 User benchmarks, average bench 128% Gigabyte(1458 4051) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing below potential (68^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	130% Outstanding	Lighting 185 Reflection 168 Parallax 175 151% 176 fps	MRender 179 Gravity 134 Splatting 115 113% 142 fps
Poor: 116% ↑ This bench: 130% Great: 136%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 39GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,590 Write 1,886 Mixed 1882 470% 2,120 MB/s	4K Read 66.5 4K Write 163 4K Mixed 87.2 299% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,214 DQ Write 1,030 DQ Mixed 1,105 833% 1,116 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 7,881 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 89GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 1307 430 1093 70 501 1267 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 47% Great: 127%
Toshiba DT01ACA300 3TB-$80 85,620 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 438GB free Firmware: MX6OABS0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 134 134 136 135 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	78.3% Very good	Read 138 Write 115 Mixed 21.6 SusWrite 134 74% 102 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.3 4K Mixed 0.5 140% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 78.3% Great: 107%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB 31,785 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.1% Very good	MC Read 29 MC Write 18 MC Mixed 28.8 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 22.9 SC Write 17.8 SC Mixed 29.1 66% 23.3 GB/s	Latency 96.2 42% 96.2 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 119%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X570M Pro4 Builds (Compare 901 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 102%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 103%

UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570M Pro4

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	155x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $185Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	117x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	111x

GPU
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	54x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	50x
RX 5700-XTAMD $199Bench 98%, 254,908 samples	49x

SSD
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	42x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $92Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	41x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	30x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	30x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	29x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	27x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 119% - Outstanding

Total price: $569

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16