Lenovo 82TF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics84.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82TF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory19.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 17 '23 at 19:59
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
99.1% Outstanding
Memory 72
1-Core 180
2-Core 359
106% 204 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 1,167
112% 921 Pts
64-Core 1,871
116% 1,871 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 99.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060 (Laptop)
Legend(17AA 3803) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.00
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.5% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 115
Parallax 104
89% 109 fps
MRender 123
Gravity 84.6
Splatting 76.4
75% 94.6 fps
Poor: 67%
This bench: 84.5%
Great: 105%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL2512HCJQ-00BL2 512GB
383GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CL1QGXA7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,974
Write 2,019
Mixed 1,970
445% 1,988 MB/s
4K Read 62.3
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 83.3
269% 91.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,383
DQ Write 481
DQ Mixed 1,008
725% 958 MB/s
Poor: 176% Great: 404%
SKHynix_HFS001TEJ9X115N 1TB
753GB free
Firmware: 51010A12
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,194
Write 2231
Mixed 2,052
552% 2,492 MB/s
4K Read 62.6
4K Write 184
4K Mixed 91.4
310% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,441
DQ Write 608
DQ Mixed 1,159
823% 1,069 MB/s
Poor: 274% Great: 549%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 24GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
138% Outstanding
MC Read 58.8
MC Write 50.4
MC Mixed 50.9
152% 53.4 GB/s
SC Read 19
SC Write 46
SC Mixed 27.4
88% 30.8 GB/s
Latency 96.8
41% 96.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 138%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82TF Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback