Lenovo 82TF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics19.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive327% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemLenovo 82TF  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory14.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221221
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 18:18
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Memory 66.8
1-Core 173
2-Core 348
101% 196 Pts
4-Core 672
8-Core 984
103% 828 Pts
64-Core 1,708
106% 1,708 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Legend(17AA 380C) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 30.0.101.1369
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
19.9% Very poor
Lighting 23.6
Reflection 105
Parallax 27.7
19% 52.1 fps
MRender 23.9
Gravity 34.7
Splatting 20.4
21% 26.3 fps
Poor: 10%
This bench: 19.9%
Great: 21%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD PC SN810 SDCPNRY-1T00-1101 1TB
762GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 61530001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1989 2318 2109 1582 1570 1196 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
327% Outstanding
Read 2,664
Write 2,239
Mixed 1,733
SusWrite 1,794
472% 2,108 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 71.1
245% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,136
DQ Write 451
DQ Mixed 915
645% 834 MB/s
Poor: 183%
This bench: 327%
Great: 565%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMCG78MEBSA092N Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOD 24GB
4800, 4800 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.2% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 27.9
MC Mixed 23.7
77% 27.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 25.1
SC Mixed 19.5
57% 19.8 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 138%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 82TF Builds (Compare 604 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

System: Lenovo 82TF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback