Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 25% Surfboard	Desktop 67% Battle cruiser	Workstation 20% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (14th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 86 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	38.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	20GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 20GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	HP Compaq Elite 8300 SFF (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3397
Memory	12.4 GB free of 20 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20130716
Uptime	3.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '23 at 09:10
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	24%

PC Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$297 278,207 User benchmarks, average bench 69% Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	64.4% Good	Memory 78.2 1-Core 78.6 2-Core 158 62% 105 Pts	4-Core 276 8-Core 382 42% 329 Pts	64-Core 389 24% 389 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 64.4% Great: 76%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% Gigabyte(1458 4026) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.98 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	38.8% Below average	Lighting 46.6 Reflection 63.6 Parallax 40.5 38% 50.2 fps	MRender 63.5 Gravity 48 Splatting 40.9 40% 50.8 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 38.8% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 4GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1H5 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 117 Write 88.9 Mixed 71.3 20% 92.5 MB/s	4K Read 10.1 4K Write 38.9 4K Mixed 21.5 63% 23.5 MB/s	DQ Read 148 DQ Write 141 DQ Mixed 38.4 58% 109 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150 19,279 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 92GB free Firmware: MS2OA5R0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 77 76 74 73 68 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	38.5% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 88.6 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 73.7 46% 63.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.5 104% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 38.5% Great: 99%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23 574,344 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 27GB free Firmware: KC66 SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 99 94 96 97 98 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	46.3% Average	Read 66 Write 72.8 Mixed 45.4 SusWrite 95.5 51% 69.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 111% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 46.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 HMT325U6CFR8C-H9 20GB 14 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 8192, 2048, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	41.8% Average	MC Read 14.8 MC Write 14.9 MC Mixed 13.5 41% 14.4 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 13.6 SC Mixed 11.3 35% 12.1 GB/s	Latency 83.9 48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 59%

Gunboat

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	1,928x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	727x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	490x

RAM
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 2x4GBMicronBench 52%, 17,707 samples	65x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples	57x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	52x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16