Lenovo 80NV

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 53.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics2.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
14 months ago, 14 months ago.
SystemLenovo 80NV  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO Allsparks 5A
Memory12 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170613
Uptime102.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 08:02
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Memory 57.3
1-Core 75.8
2-Core 138
52% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 266
8-Core 394
41% 330 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
Legend(17AA 3802) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
2.1% Terrible
Lighting 0.3
Reflection 18.2
Parallax 5.9
0% 8.13 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 5.8
Splatting 8.2
6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.1%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLV128HCGR-000L2 128GB
56GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L0QBXV7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 544
Write 156
Mixed 187
64% 296 MB/s
4K Read 21
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 22.6
87% 31.2 MB/s
DQ Read 488
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 228
193% 291 MB/s
Poor: 63% Great: 108%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: LCM2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 98.1
Mixed 54.7
67% 90.5 MB/s
4K Read 1.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.1
106% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 71%
Kingston DataTraveler 100 G3 USB 3.0 64GB-$12
34GB free, PID 1666
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.4
Write 6.7
Mixed 17.5
18% 15.9 MB/s
4K Read 3
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
66% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 6% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
38.7% Below average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.8
MC Mixed 13.2
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.3
SC Mixed 6.9
22% 7.53 GB/s
Latency 136
30% 136 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 38.7%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80NV Builds (Compare 2,006 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 80NV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback