ECS H55H-CM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics55.8% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24.8% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H55H-CM  (all builds)
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 15 '23 at 01:47
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 89.5
1-Core 73.5
2-Core 138
62% 100 Pts
4-Core 221
8-Core 307
33% 264 Pts
64-Core 320
20% 320 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.8% Above average
Lighting 68.5
Reflection 75.8
Parallax 69.2
56% 71.2 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 69.4
Splatting 68.1
56% 68.2 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
79GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 130 50 29 45 45 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.8% Poor
Read 196
Write 174
Mixed 140
SusWrite 63.6
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 12.7
4K Write 16.4
4K Mixed 9.6
40% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 17
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 18.5
14% 19.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
36.2% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 11.2
MC Mixed 11.2
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 10.7
SC Mixed 11.6
30% 10.4 GB/s
Latency 67.9
59% 67.9 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 36.2%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55H-CM Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H55H-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback