ECS H55H-CM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics53.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive22.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H55H-CM  (all builds)
Memory4.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 30 '22 at 21:03
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 27%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.7% Average
Memory 73.7
1-Core 30.9
2-Core 51.8
37% 52.1 Pts
4-Core 140
8-Core 258
24% 199 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.1% Above average
Lighting 64.5
Reflection 69.9
Parallax 64.6
53% 66.3 fps
MRender 64.1
Gravity 67.9
Splatting 66
54% 66 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.1%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
61GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 103 23 26 9.8 72 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
22.3% Poor
Read 167
Write 137
Mixed 137
SusWrite 53.8
28% 124 MB/s
4K Read 10.5
4K Write 13.9
4K Mixed 10.5
37% 11.6 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 13.6
12% 18.5 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.6
MC Mixed 6.2
19% 6.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.4
SC Write 6.9
SC Mixed 7.1
20% 7.13 GB/s
Latency 93
43% 93 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55H-CM Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H55H-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $179
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback