ECS H55H-CM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics52.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive24% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardECS H55H-CM  (all builds)
Memory3.8 GB free of 6 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20100803
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 25 '22 at 01:19
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 20%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon X3440
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.55 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
50.6% Above average
Memory 74.8
1-Core 28.2
2-Core 60.5
38% 54.5 Pts
4-Core 144
8-Core 272
25% 208 Pts
64-Core 303
19% 303 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.9% Above average
Lighting 63.7
Reflection 72.3
Parallax 66.1
52% 67.4 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 68.3
Splatting 67.4
55% 66.6 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 60%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 120GB
67GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UE4500RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 59 109 12 30 73 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24% Poor
Read 184
Write 158
Mixed 142
SusWrite 56.7
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 12.2
4K Write 13.8
4K Mixed 10.9
40% 12.3 MB/s
DQ Read 18.5
DQ Write 23.3
DQ Mixed 17.6
14% 19.8 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 24%
Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6GB
0, 0, 0 MHz
2048, 2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.9
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.2 GB/s
SC Read 8.7
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.6
22% 7.83 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H55H-CM Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H55H-CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 48% - Average Total price: $180
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback