Asus P8H77-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (25%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8H77-M  (all builds)
Memory9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130206
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '23 at 03:34
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU 25%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
71.3% Very good
Memory 89.6
1-Core 95.2
2-Core 172
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 289
8-Core 404
44% 347 Pts
64-Core 418
26% 418 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.8% Poor
Lighting 37.8
Reflection 41.2
Parallax 38.3
31% 39.1 fps
MRender 37.1
Gravity 39.5
Splatting 27.8
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
76GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 38 89 77 34 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.4% Below average
Read 216
Write 106
Mixed 109
SusWrite 73.2
28% 126 MB/s
4K Read 16.2
4K Write 21.4
4K Mixed 13.9
54% 17.2 MB/s
DQ Read 14.9
DQ Write 23.4
DQ Mixed 17
14% 18.4 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
177GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 118 118 118 120 119 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
65.3% Good
Read 110
Write 97
Mixed 77.2
SusWrite 117
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1
188% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 65.3%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
50.9% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.7
MC Mixed 16.2
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 15.8
SC Mixed 16.1
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.9%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8H77-M Builds (Compare 942 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-M - $70

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $454
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback