PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 28.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 34.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8H77-M (all builds) |
Memory | 12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130206 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Feb 14 '23 at 06:03 |
Run Duration | 126 Seconds |
Run User | ARG-User |
Background CPU | 22% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
|
59.4%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 527.56
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
28.3%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
72GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1H6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 146 41 71 39 34 68 MB/s
|
34.5%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
322GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 146 148 147 148 152 MB/s
|
73.9%
Very good
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Kingston KHX1600C9D3/4GX KHX1600C9D3/4GX 99U5471-054.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 8192 MB
|
35.5%
Below average
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 249x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 115x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 71x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 59x |
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 57x |
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples | 52x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 72% - Very good | Total price: $454 |