Lenovo 10FMS06Q00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (44th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 56 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive36.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10FMS06Q00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory8.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160606
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 13 '23 at 13:57
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (44th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
62.8% Good
Memory 78.9
1-Core 87.2
2-Core 172
66% 113 Pts
4-Core 267
8-Core 294
37% 281 Pts
64-Core 294
18% 294 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30D0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.44% Terrible
Lighting 5.9
Reflection 5
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.83 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 9.9
7% 7.9 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.44%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 333 98 67 67 68 56 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
36.4% Below average
Read 449
Write 372
Mixed 12.2
SusWrite 115
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 6.8
4K Mixed 0.3
43% 11 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 36.4%
Great: 92%
Samsung MZVLQ128HBHQ-00000 128GB
32GB free
Firmware: FXV7101Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 146 102 99 82 83 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
95.7% Outstanding
Read 980
Write 220
Mixed 302
SusWrite 113
88% 404 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 72.4
4K Mixed 32
126% 45.1 MB/s
DQ Read 291
DQ Write 211
DQ Mixed 240
182% 247 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 95.7%
Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.1% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 18.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 18.1
SC Mixed 16.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 82.5
48% 82.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 56.1%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FMS06Q00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FMS06Q00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback