Lenovo 10FMS06Q00

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics5.16% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive29.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 10FMS06Q00  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO SKYBAY
Memory8.5 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160606
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 12:33
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6500T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Memory 30.8
1-Core 78.6
2-Core 161
46% 90 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 282
35% 267 Pts
64-Core 278
17% 278 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)
Legend(17AA 30D0) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
5.16% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 5.5
Parallax 6.5
5% 5.9 fps
MRender 7.3
Gravity 5.7
Splatting 9
6% 7.33 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.16%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
174GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 334 122 57 87 38 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
29.8% Poor
Read 370
Write 338
Mixed 346
SusWrite 110
65% 291 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 5.9
4K Mixed 0.4
31% 8.1 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.8%
Great: 92%
Samsung MZVLQ128HBHQ-00000 128GB
32GB free
Firmware: FXV7101Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 974
Write 739
Mixed 687
178% 800 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 52.6
4K Mixed 36.3
121% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 457
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 363
266% 353 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 172%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16ATF1G64HZ-2G1A2 Hynix HMA851S6JJR6N-VK 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
35.3% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 12.4
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 12.3
SC Mixed 7.1
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 250
16% 250 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 35.3%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10FMS06Q00 Builds (Compare 2 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10FMS06Q00

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 19% - Very poor Total price: $27
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback