Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 38% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	3.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

PC Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-6700HQ 320,434 User benchmarks, average bench 59% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.6 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	37.7% Below average	Memory 32.8 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 131 42% 79.3 Pts	4-Core 229 8-Core 361 36% 295 Pts	64-Core 382 24% 382 Pts
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 37.7% Great: 69%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M 6,377 User benchmarks, average bench 13% HP(103C 80D4) ≥ 4GB Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.1669 Relative performance (0^th percentile)	3.14% Terrible	Lighting 4.3 Reflection 4.1 Parallax 4.5 4% 4.3 fps	MRender 5.7 Gravity 4.4 Splatting 0.1 2% 3.4 fps
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 3.14% Great: 14%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk X400 M.2 2280 256GB 11,716 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 197GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4130012 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 198 179 192 171 192 MB/s Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)	58.1% Above average	Read 382 Write 377 Mixed 276 SusWrite 194 69% 307 MB/s	4K Read 14.1 4K Write 22.5 4K Mixed 16.8 55% 17.8 MB/s	DQ Read 349 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 231 195% 285 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 58.1% Great: 90%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD8213.C16FH1 1x16GB 12 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 1 of 2 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	20.8% Poor	MC Read 7.4 MC Write 8.2 MC Mixed 7.3 22% 7.63 GB/s	SC Read 3.5 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 4.4 14% 4.83 GB/s	Latency 239 17% 239 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 20.8% Great: 40%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 62%

Destroyer

Workstation 11%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 213,495 samples	408x
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples	280x
HD P530 (Server Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 5,499 samples	87x

SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples	173x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples	74x
SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $69Bench 205%, 12,601 samples	62x

RAM
M471A1K43CB1-CRC 2x8GBSamsungBench 70%, 62,266 samples	61x
HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 2x8GBHynixBench 70%, 71,691 samples	32x
HMA82GS6AFR8N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 40%, 22,543 samples	32x