HP ZBook Studio G3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics13.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive183% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemHP ZBook Studio G3  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 80D4
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190430
Uptime1 Days
Run DateAug 11 '19 at 08:10
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1505M v5
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
69.8% Good
Memory 75.7
1-Core 113
2-Core 216
75% 135 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 479
52% 414 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1000M
HP(103C 8108) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.72
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
13.2% Very poor
Lighting 15.4
Reflection 14.8
Parallax 15.2
12% 15.1 fps
MRender 21.4
Gravity 16.8
Splatting 15.6
14% 17.9 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 13.2%
Great: 14%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57HA4103 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 816 891 906 836 912 828 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
183% Outstanding
Read 625
Write 888
Mixed 664
SusWrite 865
173% 761 MB/s
4K Read 41.7
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 61.9
210% 77.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,005
DQ Write 779
DQ Mixed 616
536% 800 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 183%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD8213.C16FH1 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
39.6% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 11.7
38% 13.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.7
SC Write 13.8
SC Mixed 13.1
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 89
45% 89 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G3 Builds (Compare 799 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback