HP Pavilion Notebook

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Notebook  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 820D
Memory5.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161013
Uptime26.2 Days
Run DateMar 11 '23 at 15:39
Run Duration117 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
31.9% Below average
Memory 27.6
1-Core 59.8
2-Core 104
34% 63.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 289
30% 242 Pts
64-Core 326
20% 326 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 31.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 530 (Mobile Skylake)
HP(103C 820D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4300
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 4.6
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 4.7
4% 4.2 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.8
Splatting 6.8
5% 5.47 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Geil R3 240G 240GB
175GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 112 1 94 0.9 71 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.4% Above average
Read 361
Write 332
Mixed 265
SusWrite 72.9
58% 258 MB/s
4K Read 21.1
4K Write 43.4
4K Mixed 20.3
81% 28.3 MB/s
DQ Read 227
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 154
141% 215 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFD8213.C16FBD1 Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
48.2% Average
MC Read 20.7
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 17
55% 19.4 GB/s
SC Read 4.2
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 6.3
20% 7.1 GB/s
Latency 269
15% 269 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 66%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Notebook Builds (Compare 8,884 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: HP Pavilion Notebook

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback