Intel B75

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics52.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardIntel B75  (all builds)
Memory10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200628
Uptime15.4 Days
Run DateMar 07 '23 at 03:20
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
70% Good
Memory 87.3
1-Core 92.9
2-Core 160
68% 113 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 469
46% 377 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 70%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
52.3% Above average
Lighting 63.9
Reflection 66.4
Parallax 61.5
52% 63.9 fps
MRender 66
Gravity 67.2
Splatting 61.5
53% 64.9 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 128GB SSD 128GB
4GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 427
Write 370
Mixed 305
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 64.6
4K Mixed 15.7
87% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 83.7
DQ Write 245
DQ Mixed 0.9
48% 110 MB/s
Poor: 34% Great: 83%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
330GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 120 116 109 113 118 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
74.4% Very good
Read 145
Write 141
Mixed 83.9
SusWrite 114
89% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
233% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 74.4%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 9905403-001.B00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
55% Above average
MC Read 20.4
MC Write 19.5
MC Mixed 17.2
54% 19 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.2
47% 16.4 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 55%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Builds (Compare 4,864 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Intel B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $384
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback