Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 48% Yacht	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	3.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	33.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-6006U 47,111 User benchmarks, average bench 36% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	50.7% Above average	Memory 73 1-Core 56.8 2-Core 108 50% 79.4 Pts	4-Core 169 8-Core 158 22% 163 Pts	64-Core 115 7% 115 Pts
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 50.7% Great: 49%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 520 FAQ - How to force Optimus or Switchable discrete GPUs? Legend(17AA 39C7) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8681 Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	3.1% Terrible	Lighting 4.5 Reflection 9.8 Parallax 5.5 4% 6.6 fps	MRender 0.3 Gravity 7.6 Splatting 0.1 2% 2.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.1% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 128GB SSD 128GB 1,066 User benchmarks, average bench 59% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0628A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 195 28 34 30 34 28 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	33.6% Below average	Read 425 Write 326 Mixed 25.9 SusWrite 58.2 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 6.7 4K Write 18.8 4K Mixed 9.8 33% 11.8 MB/s	DQ Read 82.5 DQ Write 46.9 DQ Mixed 1 18% 43.5 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 33.6% Great: 83%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GB 40,829 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	28.2% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10.2 MC Mixed 8 27% 9.37 GB/s	SC Read 8.3 SC Write 6.6 SC Mixed 9.7 23% 8.2 GB/s	Latency 94.6 42% 94.6 ns
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 28.2% Great: 38%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 38%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD Graphics 520IntelBench 4%, 9,911 samples	793x
920MXNvidiaBench 6%, 8,308 samples	119x
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	23x

RAM
M471A5244CB0-CRC 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 40,829 samples	353x
M471A5244CB0-CRC Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH 8GBSamsungBench 60%, 4,290 samples	59x
M471A5244CB0-CRC 2x4GBSamsungBench 57%, 36,396 samples	45x

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16