To Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics42% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Intel X79  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191230
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 06 '23 at 05:26
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 75.5
1-Core 68.3
2-Core 136
56% 93.4 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 531
50% 415 Pts
64-Core 791
49% 791 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
Asus(1043 051D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1256 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.5.1
Performing below potential (27th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42% Average
Lighting 52.6
Reflection 52.1
Parallax 71.9
43% 58.9 fps
MRender 51.8
Gravity 56.7
Splatting 41.8
40% 50.1 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 42%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 120GB-$15
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 150 48 74 60 74 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
37.8% Below average
Read 416
Write 165
Mixed 13.5
SusWrite 76.4
36% 168 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 16
4K Mixed 13
25% 9.7 MB/s
DQ Read 100
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 1.1
51% 118 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HDT721010SLA360 1TB-$69
838GB free
Firmware: ST6OA3AA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 97 95 96 95 96 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Read 96.8
Write 101
Mixed 45.9
SusWrite 95.8
62% 84.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
153% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393B1K70BH1- 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
33% Below average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 8.4
MC Mixed 10.5
34% 12 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 3.3
SC Mixed 4.3
16% 5.57 GB/s
Latency 89.3
45% 89.3 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Intel X79 Builds (Compare 1,984 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 40%
Speed boat

Motherboard: To Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback