Pcware IPMH310 PRO 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.94% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive69.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemPcware IPMH310 PRO 2.0  (all builds)
MotherboardPCWARE IPMH310 PRO 2.0
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 23:16
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 33%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$179
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Memory 79.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 258
85% 156 Pts
4-Core 464
8-Core 784
76% 624 Pts
64-Core 952
59% 952 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Elitegroup(1019 A55C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2115
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.94% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 7.8
5% 7.3 fps
MRender 5.8
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 12.8
8% 8.6 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.94%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingchuxing 512GB 512GB
412GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 280 307 344 270 266 265 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
69.9% Good
Read 378
Write 300
Mixed 315
SusWrite 289
72% 321 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 71.2
4K Mixed 19
94% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 41.1
80% 153 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 69.9%
Great: 224%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SF4721G8CK8M8GKSBI 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30.6% Below average
MC Read 12.2
MC Write 9.7
MC Mixed 8.4
29% 10.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.4
SC Write 7.9
SC Mixed 9.3
25% 8.87 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 30.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical IPMH310 PRO 2.0 Builds (Compare 55 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski

System: Pcware IPMH310 PRO 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $240
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback