Alphasync 1140695

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 111%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics151% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAlphasync 1140695  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H410M-E
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210709
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 03 '23 at 16:18
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98
LGA1200, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.6% Excellent
Memory 87.1
1-Core 123
2-Core 244
85% 152 Pts
4-Core 442
8-Core 712
71% 577 Pts
64-Core 899
56% 899 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
Asus(1043 87C1) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
151% Outstanding
Lighting 225
Reflection 210
Parallax 204
183% 213 fps
MRender 194
Gravity 148
Splatting 132
126% 158 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 151%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate BarraCuda Q1 SSD ZA480CV10001 480GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STWSN010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 1.8 1.5 1.4 1.1 1.4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 324
Write 390
Mixed 322
SusWrite 55.7
61% 273 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 83.3
4K Mixed 35.6
134% 49.4 MB/s
DQ Read 216
DQ Write 269
DQ Mixed 162
144% 216 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 97%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$46
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 21,697
Mixed 99.7
7,790% 10,898 MB/s
4K Read 14.9
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 1
756% 5.73 MB/s
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 16.9
MC Mixed 13.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 70.4
57% 70.4 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1140695 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

System: Alphasync 1140695

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 77% - Very good Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback