Alphasync 1126608

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics142% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAlphasync 1126608  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B450M-A II
Memory8.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201202
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 11 '21 at 16:27
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Memory 63
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
77% 145 Pts
4-Core 447
8-Core 757
73% 602 Pts
64-Core 1,203
74% 1,203 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
MSI(1462 390C) ≥ 4GB; AlphaSync RTX 3070
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.96
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
142% Outstanding
Lighting 207
Reflection 195
Parallax 175
169% 193 fps
MRender 183
Gravity 141
Splatting 124
119% 149 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 142%
Great: 158%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
15GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM22.7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 742
Write 1,095
Mixed 980
212% 939 MB/s
4K Read 44.1
4K Write 93.6
4K Mixed 38.3
166% 58.7 MB/s
DQ Read 717
DQ Write 528
DQ Mixed 652
480% 633 MB/s
Poor: 125% Great: 262%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
1GB free
Firmware: CC43
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 159
Write 165
Mixed 72.8
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.6
119% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GC3200C16K2E 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
33.7% Below average
MC Read 11.7
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 14.2
SC Mixed 13.9
39% 13.7 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 33.7%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 1126608 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 107%
UFO

System: Alphasync 1126608

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $690
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $109Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $397
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback