Dell XPS 8500

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.09% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
6 years ago, 6 years ago.
SystemDell XPS 8500  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 0NW73C
Memory18.5 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130828
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '17 at 03:28
Run Duration810 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 104
2-Core 210
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 515
54% 434 Pts
64-Core 517
32% 517 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
ATI Radeon HD 5400
PwrHis(1787 3000) 1GB
Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.09% Terrible
Lighting 1.33
Reflection 1.58
Parallax 1.59
1% 1.5 fps
MRender 1.71
Gravity 0.83
Splatting 1.43
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.09%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
56.7% Above average
Read 482
Write 247
Mixed 197
68% 308 MB/s
4K Read 19.1
4K Write 47.4
4K Mixed 5.82
62% 24.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 114
DQ Mixed 5.18
34% 78.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 56.7%
Great: 74%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
2.5TB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
20.7% Poor
Read 26.3
Write 22
Mixed 22.7
30% 23.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.91
4K Write 3.86
4K Mixed 0.43
149% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 20.7%
Great: 57%
ST350064 1AS 500GB
143GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
12% Very poor
Read 26.8
Write 22.9
Mixed 11.3
24% 20.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 0.99
4K Mixed 0.21
42% 0.56 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12%
Great: 21%
NORELSYS 106X 3TB
126GB free, PID 1066
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
14.7% Very poor
Read 26.5
Write 23.7
Mixed 23.9
31% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.81
4K Mixed 0.2
70% 0.79 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 14.7%
Great: 73%
Generic Flash Disk 67GB
57GB free, PID 7777
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
5.41% Terrible
Read 22.3
Write 5.43
Mixed 2.86
9% 10.2 MB/s
4K Read 4.16
4K Write 0.003
4K Mixed 0.002
16% 1.39 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 5.41%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G M378B5273EB0-CK0 Kingston KHX1866C10D3/8G 24GB
1600, 1333, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
55.6% Above average
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.3
MC Mixed 16.8
54% 19.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.9
51% 17.9 GB/s
Latency 72.2
55% 72.2 ns
Poor: 54%
This bench: 55.6%
Great: 56%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical XPS 8500 Builds (Compare 2,116 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Dell XPS 8500

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback