Acer Aspire T3-600

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics84.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive26.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAcer Aspire T3-600  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire T3-600
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130430
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 13:29
Run Duration142 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 5600-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 76
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 171
66% 114 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 409
45% 355 Pts
64-Core 417
26% 417 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 5600-XT-$300
Ram: 6GB, Driver: 23.2.2
Performing below potential (73rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.9% Excellent
Lighting 108
Reflection 119
Parallax 175
88% 134 fps
MRender 98.5
Gravity 120
Splatting 75.2
78% 97.8 fps
Poor: 77%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR056
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 101 51 80 66 61 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.9% Poor
Read 252
Write 231
Mixed 17.4
SusWrite 78.7
32% 145 MB/s
4K Read 18.3
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 0.3
34% 10.1 MB/s
DQ Read 117
DQ Write 12.9
DQ Mixed 26.5
29% 52.3 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
473GB free
Firmware: CC44
SusWrite @10s intervals: 25 37 57 38 54 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
14.6% Very poor
Read 7.2
Write 17.4
Mixed 12.5
SusWrite 43.8
15% 20.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 0.23 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 14.6%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$30
334GB free
Firmware: JC4B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 116 118 118 118 118 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 66
SusWrite 118
77% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AM2U16BC4P2-B05B AM2U16BC4P2-B05B Hynix HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 070E U3A4G93-13G9HE3B00 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 15.9
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.2
44% 15.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.8
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 88.3
45% 88.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire T3-600 Builds (Compare 34 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire T3-600

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $88
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback