Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 339%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 391%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 110%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics321% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive244% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
15 months ago, 14 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220223
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 01 '23 at 01:27
Run Duration336 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$360
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 176
2-Core 342
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 681
8-Core 1,339
119% 1010 Pts
64-Core 2,529
156% 2,529 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,650
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 531.18
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
321% Outstanding
Lighting 485
Reflection 503
Parallax 600
395% 529 fps
MRender 471
Gravity 535
Splatting 285
338% 430 fps
Poor: 303%
This bench: 321%
Great: 407%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair MP600 CORE 2TB
500GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM52.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1323 239 257 247 254 250 MB/s
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
244% Outstanding
Read 1,560
Write 3,246
Mixed 1,761
SusWrite 428
396% 1,749 MB/s
4K Read 48.6
4K Write 208
4K Mixed 81.3
288% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 1,469
DQ Write 1514
DQ Mixed 1615
1,180% 1,533 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 244%
Great: 442%
Crucial BX500 240GB-$27
84GB free
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 164 100 73 113 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 394
Write 340
Mixed 326
SusWrite 149
68% 302 MB/s
4K Read 27
4K Write 80
4K Mixed 27.8
119% 44.9 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 184
DQ Mixed 0.5
54% 130 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 92%
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
12GB free
Firmware: 5.8.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 76 69 68 100 76 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 165
Write 103
Mixed 95.5
SusWrite 79
25% 111 MB/s
4K Read 8.5
4K Write 74.9
4K Mixed 25.2
85% 36.2 MB/s
DQ Read 74.9
DQ Write 111
DQ Mixed 82.9
66% 89.5 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 80%
Seagate IronWolf510 ZP1920NM30001-2S9303 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: STIS1029
SusWrite @10s intervals: 909 935 945 938 912 688 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
199% Outstanding
Read 1,024
Write 954
Mixed 555
SusWrite 888
192% 855 MB/s
4K Read 25
4K Write 194
4K Mixed 33.1
183% 84.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,338
DQ Write 901
DQ Mixed 845
705% 1,028 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 199%
Great: 221%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$70
292GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 801 102 102 86 98 110 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
165% Outstanding
Read 1,385
Write 1,275
Mixed 917
SusWrite 216
211% 948 MB/s
4K Read 41.9
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 58.7
204% 74.7 MB/s
DQ Read 637
DQ Write 870
DQ Mixed 270
339% 592 MB/s
Poor: 127%
This bench: 165%
Great: 255%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33
292GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 101 101 99 99 83 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
49.3% Average
Read 74.7
Write 76.8
Mixed 58.5
SusWrite 96.8
57% 76.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
170% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 49.3%
Great: 62%
WD Blue 250GB (2010)-$23
128GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 98 97 97 79 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
56.4% Above average
Read 102
Write 104
Mixed 71.3
SusWrite 94.4
68% 92.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
153% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.4%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
144% Outstanding
MC Read 81
MC Write 40.7
MC Mixed 44.2
158% 55.3 GB/s
SC Read 29.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 39.4
88% 30.9 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 144%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X570 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,885 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 124%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 79% - Very good Total price: $766
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback