Asus P5KR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 43.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics51.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5KR  (all builds)
Memory3.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080626
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 24 '15 at 10:06
Run Duration209 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 16%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
43.5% Average
Memory 64.2
1-Core 36.1
2-Core 72.9
38% 57.7 Pts
4-Core 135
8-Core 130
18% 133 Pts
64-Core 134
8% 134 Pts
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 50%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Driver: nvd3dumx.dll Ver. 10.18.13.6143
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
51.9% Above average
Lighting 65.9
Reflection 65.3
Parallax 63.6
54% 64.9 fps
MRender 69.5
Gravity 60.5
Splatting 51.5
48% 60.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 51.9%
Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.15 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
28.9% Poor
Read 101
Write 100
Mixed 94
22% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 37.1
4K Mixed 9.02
59% 21.5 MB/s
DQ Read 20.8
DQ Write 50.8
DQ Mixed 9.09
15% 26.9 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 28.9%
Great: 61%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 322GB
261GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 201
Write 216
Mixed 181
149% 199 MB/s
4K Read 0.78
4K Write 3.32
4K Mixed 0.83
186% 1.64 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 119%
Great: 165%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.11 1.5TB-$88
217GB free
Firmware: CC1H Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
46.5% Average
Read 79
Write 83
Mixed 65.1
57% 75.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.62
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.36
94% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 70%
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1TB
139GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
75.6% Very good
Read 104
Write 159
Mixed 120
96% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 2.62
4K Mixed 0.52
127% 1.21 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 75.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR2
Performing below potential (29th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.6% Very poor
MC Read 5.8
MC Write 5.8
MC Mixed 5.2
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.9
SC Write 5.4
SC Mixed 5.5
14% 4.93 GB/s
Latency 116
34% 116 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 17.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5KR Builds (Compare 19 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5KR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 49% - Average Total price: $299
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback