Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (4th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 96 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory21.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210810
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 28 '23 at 16:37
Run Duration82 Seconds
Run User SGP-User
Background CPU 100%
Watch Gameplay: 3070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 111
2-Core 204
72% 128 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 1,096
97% 825 Pts
64-Core 1,557
96% 1,557 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-$500
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 217
Parallax 143
116% 168 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 142
Splatting 140
116% 142 fps
Poor: 135%
This bench: 113%
Great: 158%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-AG70S1TB 1TB
145GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EIFM21.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 669
Write 2,675
Mixed 750
311% 1,365 MB/s
4K Read 36
4K Write 200
4K Mixed 35.8
206% 90.5 MB/s
DQ Read 805
DQ Write 782
DQ Mixed 810
604% 799 MB/s
Poor: 211% Great: 512%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
KLEVV KD4AGU880-36A180C 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
77.5% Very good
MC Read 34.8
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 31.5
82% 28.8 GB/s
SC Read 20.7
SC Write 19.9
SC Mixed 20.7
58% 20.4 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 126%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 4,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550M-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $752
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback