HP 550-122nl

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemHP 550-122nl  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 2B47
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160111
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 27 '23 at 08:49
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700-$170
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 83.2
1-Core 99.1
2-Core 211
74% 131 Pts
4-Core 368
8-Core 535
56% 451 Pts
64-Core 532
33% 532 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
MSI(1462 292A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 472.08
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
5.2% Terrible
Lighting 6.4
Reflection 5.1
Parallax 8
5% 6.5 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 7.2
Splatting 7
5% 6.17 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.2%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 500GB-$90
431GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 319 306 298 286 292 289 MB/s
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 476
Write 398
Mixed 255
SusWrite 298
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 24.8
4K Write 59
4K Mixed 35.7
115% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 268
DQ Mixed 211
188% 285 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 87.5%
Great: 107%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 184 185 188 196 196 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 86
Mixed 81.1
SusWrite 190
99% 135 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
144% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 107%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M391B1G73QH0-YK0 Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
59.3% Above average
MC Read 21.5
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 18.1
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 21.2
SC Mixed 18.6
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 550-122nl Builds (Compare 13 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 67%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP 550-122nl

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $246
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback