Samsung 740U3M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics5.01% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive194% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (70%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSamsung 740U3M  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG NP740U3M-K01US
Memory19 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 26 '23 at 18:16
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 70%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 60.5
1-Core 68.2
2-Core 151
53% 93.3 Pts
4-Core 215
8-Core 223
29% 219 Pts
64-Core 219
14% 219 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake)
Sanyo(144D C14B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9415
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
5.01% Terrible
Lighting 5.6
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 5.8
5% 5.03 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 6
Splatting 8.7
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.01%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$84
200GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 675 721 684 669 681 668 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
194% Outstanding
Read 1,246
Write 1,236
Mixed 973
SusWrite 683
232% 1,035 MB/s
4K Read 50.4
4K Write 116
4K Mixed 69.7
227% 78.6 MB/s
DQ Read 837
DQ Write 577
DQ Mixed 627
490% 680 MB/s
Poor: 199%
This bench: 194%
Great: 340%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16S4B.16FE Kingston RB32D4S2S1ME-8 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43.9% Average
MC Read 16.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 14.9
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.7
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 14.2
38% 13.5 GB/s
Latency 126
32% 126 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 43.9%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 740U3M Builds (Compare 27 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 53%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung 740U3M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback