TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 7010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.13% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemDell OptiPlex 7010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 7010  (all builds)
Memory25.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180628
Uptime7 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 22:04
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 72.4
1-Core 82.7
2-Core 175
63% 110 Pts
4-Core 301
8-Core 464
47% 382 Pts
64-Core 459
28% 459 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 64.1%
 Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)-$15
Dell(1028 0577) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4425
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
3.13% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 1.9
Parallax 2.7
3% 2.83 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.3
3% 3.67 fps
Poor: 3% ↑
This bench: 3.13%
 Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 250GB-$23
27GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 108
Write 127
Mixed 66
74% 100 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.9
145% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 74%
Seagate OneTouch HDD 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 1708
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 30.5
Write 29
Mixed 27.2
22% 28.9 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 20% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5471-041.A00LF 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
29.5% Poor
MC Read 10.4
MC Write 9.8
MC Mixed 8.8
28% 9.67 GB/s
SC Read 10
SC Write 8.8
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 95.9
42% 95.9 ns
Poor: 30% ↑
This bench: 29.5%
 Great: 51%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 7010 Builds (Compare 11,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 7010

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples3,958x
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples3,578x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples1,624x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples2,206x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples993x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples941x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples468x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples186x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples182x
RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples228x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples159x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 4x4GBMicronBench 56%, 6,584 samples152x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback