Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory22.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 12:20
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 31%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 84
1-Core 110
2-Core 210
77% 135 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 630
59% 490 Pts
64-Core 789
49% 789 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 142
Parallax 160
119% 150 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 124
Splatting 111
112% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$84
225GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 472
Write 443
Mixed 388
97% 434 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 37.2
120% 40 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 248
DQ Mixed 231
181% 250 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
56GB free
Firmware: 400i
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 361
Write 158
Mixed 179
51% 233 MB/s
4K Read 26.1
4K Write 50.2
4K Mixed 31.8
107% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 201
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 140
116% 167 MB/s
Poor: 57% Great: 88%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
183GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 119
Write 113
Mixed 78.3
77% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 1.4
267% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 49% Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
536GB free
Firmware: CC27
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 146
Write 115
Mixed 67.9
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
152% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1TB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 117
Write 126
Mixed 65.9
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 40% Great: 85%
ST340063 3A 400GB
32GB free, PID 0502
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 3,723
Mixed 32.5
1,251% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.7
49% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 18%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 34
MC Write 33.5
MC Mixed 29.3
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.8
SC Write 15.5
SC Mixed 12.9
41% 14.4 GB/s
Latency 73.5
54% 73.5 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $942
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback