Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 18 '23 at 08:56
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 35%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 80.9
1-Core 113
2-Core 227
78% 140 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 588
63% 500 Pts
64-Core 827
51% 827 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 144
Parallax 146
119% 145 fps
MRender 188
Gravity 124
Splatting 111
112% 141 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$64
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 417 417 392 411 426 427 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
96.9% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 456
Mixed 396
SusWrite 415
99% 440 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 56.3
4K Mixed 39.4
128% 42.4 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 256
DQ Mixed 254
194% 262 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.9%
Great: 125%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
56GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 142 144 146 143 145 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
69.3% Good
Read 410
Write 163
Mixed 216
SusWrite 144
52% 233 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 53
4K Mixed 32.4
114% 38.3 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 181
139% 192 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 69.3%
Great: 88%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
247GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 113 112 116 113 115 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
75% Very good
Read 147
Write 142
Mixed 88.7
SusWrite 114
90% 123 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.4
253% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
542GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 147 148 149 149 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Read 138
Write 104
Mixed 72.1
SusWrite 146
84% 115 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1TB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 121 122 123 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 125
Write 119
Mixed 63.7
SusWrite 121
79% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
188% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
85.4% Excellent
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 30
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 13.4
44% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 78.9
51% 78.9 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback