Asus P9X79 PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 90%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive96.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P9X79 PRO  (all builds)
Memory27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140725
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 20:18
Run Duration176 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K
LGA2011, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
77.5% Very good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 111
2-Core 217
77% 137 Pts
4-Core 392
8-Core 627
62% 509 Pts
64-Core 785
49% 785 Pts
Poor: 66%
This bench: 77.5%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
Nvidia(10DE 139F) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
113% Outstanding
Lighting 145
Reflection 144
Parallax 144
118% 145 fps
MRender 186
Gravity 122
Splatting 111
110% 139 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 113%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$64
215GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR033
SusWrite @10s intervals: 392 411 395 415 418 416 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
96.1% Outstanding
Read 482
Write 439
Mixed 396
SusWrite 408
97% 431 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 55.8
4K Mixed 38.1
123% 41.1 MB/s
DQ Read 344
DQ Write 261
DQ Mixed 249
201% 285 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96.1%
Great: 125%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$199
56GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 144 141 149 144 142 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
68.4% Good
Read 413
Write 159
Mixed 208
SusWrite 142
51% 231 MB/s
4K Read 28.4
4K Write 52.3
4K Mixed 31.8
112% 37.5 MB/s
DQ Read 237
DQ Write 153
DQ Mixed 176
136% 188 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 88%
WD WD6000HLHX-01JJPV0 600GB
247GB free
Firmware: 04.05G04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 114 114 114 112 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
75.5% Very good
Read 150
Write 138
Mixed 88.9
SusWrite 113
90% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.3
249% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.5%
Great: 80%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
542GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 145 149 147 148 148 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 148
Write 104
Mixed 75
SusWrite 146
87% 118 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.9
151% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249
1TB free
Firmware: MN6OA800
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 118 123 122 122 122 MB/s
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
70.6% Very good
Read 124
Write 124
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 122
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 70.6%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ16GX3M2A1600C1 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 CMZ8GX3M1A1600C10 32GB
1066, 1066, 1066, 1066 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.9% Excellent
MC Read 34.7
MC Write 34
MC Mixed 29.8
94% 32.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 84.9%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P9X79 PRO Builds (Compare 1,423 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P9X79 PRO - $374

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback