TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Gigabyte GA-X5X7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics46.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive132% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X5X7  (all builds)
Memory37 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180724
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 24 '23 at 10:39
Run Duration211 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HK
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
69.4% Good
Memory 77.8
1-Core 97.5
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 329
8-Core 501
51% 415 Pts
64-Core 495
31% 495 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 69.4%
 Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070 (Mobile)
Gigabyte(1458 3559) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
46.6% Average
Lighting 58.9
Reflection 51
Parallax 51.8
48% 53.9 fps
MRender 11.6
Gravity 59.1
Splatting 77.9
44% 49.5 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 46.6%
 Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57XA4104 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 615 761 786 700 680 530 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
132% Outstanding
Read 1,071
Write 1,020
Mixed 803
SusWrite 678
201% 893 MB/s
4K Read 22.1
4K Write 46.8
4K Mixed 34.5
102% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 419
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 333
252% 341 MB/s
Poor: 90% ↑
This bench: 132%
 Great: 235%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$137
168GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 348 407 404 418 425 432 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
81.4% Excellent
Read 450
Write 384
Mixed 401
SusWrite 406
92% 410 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 26.1
86% 27.3 MB/s
DQ Read 284
DQ Write 255
DQ Mixed 281
207% 273 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑
This bench: 81.4%
 Great: 133%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
380GB free
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 879 643 642 638 634 614 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
145% Outstanding
Read 1,361
Write 1,204
Mixed 568
SusWrite 675
212% 952 MB/s
4K Read 26.6
4K Write 44.4
4K Mixed 32.1
105% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 355
268% 363 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑
This bench: 145%
 Great: 254%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-2400C16-8GRS 859B BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 04CD F4-2400C16-8GRS 859B BLS16G4S240FSD.16FBD 48GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77% Very good
MC Read 26.5
MC Write 30.7
MC Mixed 25.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 33.1
SC Mixed 21.1
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 84.7
47% 84.7 ns
Poor: 76% ↑
This bench: 77%
 Great: 77%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical GA-X5X7 Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X5X7

CPU
Core i7-7820HKIntelBench 72%, 18,903 samples10x
GPU
GTX 1070 (Mobile)NvidiaBench 72%, 73,882 samples10x
SSD
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GBSamsungBench 219%, 21,747 samples2x
THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBToshibaBench 160%, 14,022 samples2x
SM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsungBench 238%, 21,542 samples1x
RAM
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 75%, 4,823 samples4x
F4 DDR4 2400 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 77%, 3,102 samples2x
CT16G4SFD824A.C16FBD 4x16GBCrucialBench 75%, 45 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback