RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics47.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive89.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemRM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320  (all builds)
MotherboardIntel DQ77CP
Memory6.6 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181025
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 23 '23 at 02:02
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User PAK-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
70.3% Very good
Memory 81
1-Core 95.7
2-Core 190
70% 122 Pts
4-Core 322
8-Core 474
50% 398 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.7% Average
Lighting 59.9
Reflection 60
Parallax 81.3
49% 67.1 fps
MRender 60.1
Gravity 66.4
Splatting 44.5
45% 57 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 47.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0427BNR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 405 416 417 444 443 445 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.4% Excellent
Read 444
Write 419
Mixed 401
SusWrite 428
95% 423 MB/s
4K Read 23.9
4K Write 51.9
4K Mixed 30.9
103% 35.6 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 346
DQ Mixed 245
201% 282 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.4%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150
88GB free
Firmware: JPFOA39C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 74 74 74 75 75 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
43.7% Average
Read 77.5
Write 76.3
Mixed 44
SusWrite 74.6
50% 68.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 43.7%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 M378B5173DB0-CK0 10GB
1333, 1333, 1600 MHz
2048, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
48.1% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 15.1
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 15.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 78.7
51% 78.7 ns
Poor: 47%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320 Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $119
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback