Performance Results


Gaming 35% Jet ski	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 29% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	47.6% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	10GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 10GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	RM DESKTOP ECOQUIET 320 (all builds)
Motherboard	Intel DQ77CP
Memory	5.9 GB free of 10 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181025
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 22 '23 at 18:53
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	PAK-User
Background CPU	5%

PC Performing as expected (48^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1245 V2-$368 2,442 User benchmarks, average bench 73% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (26^th percentile)	68.5% Good	Memory 74.3 1-Core 94 2-Core 188 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 340 8-Core 480 52% 410 Pts	64-Core 473 29% 473 Pts
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 68.5% Great: 80%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% Gigabyte(1458 22F0) CLim: 1280 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.2 Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	47.6% Average	Lighting 59.7 Reflection 60.2 Parallax 81.2 49% 67 fps	MRender 60 Gravity 66.6 Splatting 44.5 45% 57 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 47.6% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata SU650 240GB-$70 47,016 User benchmarks, average bench 70% 49GB free (System drive) Firmware: V8X21c64 SusWrite @10s intervals: 296 192 186 103 6.4 64 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)	60.8% Good	Read 389 Write 355 Mixed 334 SusWrite 141 68% 305 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 45.6 4K Mixed 26.6 88% 30.7 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 228 DQ Mixed 194 149% 200 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 60.8% Great: 99%
Transcend TS256GSSD230S 256GB 3,887 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 238GB free Firmware: R0427BNR SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 228 231 239 240 241 MB/s Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	64.2% Good	Read 254 Write 233 Mixed 231 SusWrite 234 54% 238 MB/s	4K Read 23.6 4K Write 43.8 4K Mixed 30.8 98% 32.7 MB/s	DQ Read 201 DQ Write 194 DQ Mixed 171 136% 189 MB/s
Poor: 56% ↑ This bench: 64.2% Great: 114%
Hitachi HDS721032CLA362 320GB-$150 10,092 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 88GB free Firmware: JPFOA39C SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 75 74 74 76 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	43.7% Average	Read 77.5 Write 77.2 Mixed 44.3 SusWrite 74.7 50% 68.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 43.7% Great: 50%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 Hynix HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 M378B5173DB0-CK0 10GB 2 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 1333, 1333, 1600 MHz 2048, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	46.5% Average	MC Read 16.4 MC Write 16.5 MC Mixed 14.9 46% 15.9 GB/s	SC Read 15 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 14.7 44% 15.4 GB/s	Latency 91.8 44% 91.8 ns
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 19%

Surfboard

Desktop 65%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 15%

Surfboard

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	4x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	3x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	2x

SSD
TS256GSSD230S 256GBTranscendBench 89%, 3,887 samples	2x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	2x
X25-M 80GBIntelBench 34%, 12,660 samples	1x

RAM
EBJ10UE8BDF0-DJ-F 830B M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 GU502203EP0201 8GBElpidaBench 47%, 4 samples	4x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 3x4GBHynixBench 44%, 503 samples	2x
M2F4G64CB8HG5N-CG Samsung M378B5673FH0-CH9 GU502203EP0201 7GBUnknownBench 33%, 2 samples	2x

Value: 98% - Outstanding

Total price: $119

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16