Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics119% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive247% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory57.7 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210323
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateFeb 21 '23 at 20:52
Run Duration243 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 10600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$191
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
92% Outstanding
Memory 93.6
1-Core 126
2-Core 266
90% 162 Pts
4-Core 485
8-Core 842
80% 664 Pts
64-Core 1,013
63% 1,013 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 92%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$210
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (76th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
119% Outstanding
Lighting 156
Reflection 152
Parallax 154
127% 154 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 131
Splatting 116
116% 146 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$139
248GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B6QCXP7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1342 1286 1253 1164 1107 1078 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
247% Outstanding
Read 2,198
Write 1,692
Mixed 867
SusWrite 1,205
332% 1,490 MB/s
4K Read 41.1
4K Write 97.8
4K Mixed 54.2
184% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 706
DQ Write 570
DQ Mixed 612
465% 629 MB/s
Poor: 159%
This bench: 247%
Great: 353%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$58
585GB free
Firmware: 42A4SANA Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1823 1870 1870 1860 1860 1860 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
313% Outstanding
Read 2,486
Write 1,793
Mixed 200
SusWrite 1857
352% 1,584 MB/s
4K Read 50.7
4K Write 107
4K Mixed 68
221% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 790
DQ Write 611
DQ Mixed 569
462% 657 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 313%
Great: 372%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
1TB free
Firmware: CC9C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 154 151 157 151 161 156 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 179
Write 136
Mixed 81.7
SusWrite 155
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 113%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
25GB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 181 180 182 180 181 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
80% Very good
Read 96.5
Write 128
Mixed 91.2
SusWrite 181
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
254% 2.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 80%
Great: 92%
Intel Raid 5 Volume 12TB
8TB free
Firmware: 1.0.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 38 37 36 40 34 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 212%
Seagate Backup+ Hub BK 8TB
2.5TB free
Firmware: D781
SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 127 129 128 127 128 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 100
Write 116
Mixed 80.9
SusWrite 128
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.6
208% 2.03 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 92%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 029E CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 KF3200C16D4/16GX 029E CMK32GX4M2A2666C16 64GB
2666, 2666, 2666, 2666 MHz
16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 26.8
87% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 37.6
SC Mixed 27.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
Latency 60.8
66% 60.8 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 110%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 100%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z370 AORUS Gaming WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $797
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback