Asus P8P67

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive71.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P8P67  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit 色彩
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120514
Uptime1 Days
Run DateFeb 20 '23 at 13:27
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User TWN-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
71.9% Very good
Memory 84.8
1-Core 94.3
2-Core 183
70% 121 Pts
4-Core 321
8-Core 451
48% 386 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 640
Asus(1043 83F3) 2GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 445 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.4
Reflection 7.6
Parallax 8.8
6% 7.93 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 10
Splatting 8.3
7% 8.83 fps
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SA510 2.5 250GB
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 52008100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 248 181 279 324 149 106 MB/s
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
71.5% Very good
Read 425
Write 377
Mixed 349
SusWrite 214
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 49.7
4K Mixed 25.2
91% 32 MB/s
DQ Read 323
DQ Write 284
DQ Mixed 3.9
85% 204 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 71.5%
Great: 100%
Intel Raid 1 Volume 3TB
915GB free
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 78 81 81 82 80 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 108
Write 94.6
Mixed 49.2
SusWrite 80.4
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
197% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$80
209GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 81 81 43 56 66 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
49.5% Average
Read 104
Write 111
Mixed 61.6
SusWrite 68.3
63% 86.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 96%
Asmt 2135 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 116 118 121 119 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 88.9
Write 101
Mixed 73.2
SusWrite 119
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
178% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 103%
WDC WD40 EZRZ-00GXCB0 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 65 66 67 66 66 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
35.6% Below average
Read 112
Write 104
Mixed 67.4
SusWrite 65.5
114% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
88% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 35.6%
Great: 67%
WDC WD80 03FRYZ-01JPDB1 8TB
2TB free, PID 2773
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 66 66 67 67 66 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.5% Below average
Read 121
Write 116
Mixed 86.5
SusWrite 65.6
128% 97.1 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.5
138% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 39.5%
Great: 40%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.4% Above average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.6
MC Mixed 15.7
49% 17.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.6
SC Write 17.5
SC Mixed 16.8
47% 16.3 GB/s
Latency 72.1
56% 72.1 ns
Poor: 43%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8P67 Builds (Compare 1,497 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $666
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback