Acer Aspire TC-885

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics5.23% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive211% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Aspire TC-885  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Aspire TC-885(DCH)
Memory24.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200408
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 19 '23 at 21:01
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400-$160
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
80.9% Excellent
Memory 76.6
1-Core 124
2-Core 248
82% 149 Pts
4-Core 471
8-Core 593
68% 532 Pts
64-Core 634
39% 634 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 80.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630 (Desktop Coffee Lake i5 i7)
Acer(1025 1238) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7262
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
5.23% Terrible
Lighting 5.1
Reflection 7.8
Parallax 6.7
4% 6.53 fps
MRender 10
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.4
7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.23%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2200_MTFDHBA512TCK 512GB
320GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P1MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1285 1365 1390 1236 1067 323 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
211% Outstanding
Read 1,555
Write 1,345
Mixed 1,091
SusWrite 1,111
286% 1,276 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 48.3
156% 53.2 MB/s
DQ Read 738
DQ Write 713
DQ Mixed 718
541% 723 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 211%
Great: 239%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL.9BWWA.226 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 22.3
MC Write 20.2
MC Mixed 16.9
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 21.4
SC Mixed 15.1
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 87.1
46% 87.1 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 132%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire TC-885 Builds (Compare 1,852 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire TC-885

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $114
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback