Asrock B360 Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 121%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics131% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive173% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B360 Pro4  (all builds)
Memory54.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180709
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 15:28
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User BGR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$186
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
91.7% Outstanding
Memory 90.2
1-Core 129
2-Core 257
88% 159 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 811
80% 656 Pts
64-Core 999
62% 999 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 91.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Nvidia(10DE 153C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
131% Outstanding
Lighting 184
Reflection 176
Parallax 170
150% 176 fps
MRender 192
Gravity 138
Splatting 119
119% 150 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 131%
Great: 136%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
483GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1273 1080 444 467 334 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
173% Outstanding
Read 1,069
Write 1,274
Mixed 1,057
SusWrite 667
229% 1,017 MB/s
4K Read 41.6
4K Write 83
4K Mixed 53.5
176% 59.4 MB/s
DQ Read 900
DQ Write 667
DQ Mixed 794
591% 787 MB/s
Poor: 149%
This bench: 173%
Great: 365%
SSDSC2KG019T8R 2TB
925GB free
Firmware: XCV1DL63
SusWrite @10s intervals: 357 401 410 423 425 426 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Read 268
Write 359
Mixed 294
SusWrite 407
75% 332 MB/s
4K Read 14.5
4K Write 60.6
4K Mixed 26.3
88% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 270
209% 285 MB/s
Poor: 76%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 94%
Intel 660p NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$60
29GB free
Firmware: 002C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,284
Write 857
Mixed 819
218% 987 MB/s
4K Read 39.8
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 51.2
171% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 335
DQ Write 723
DQ Mixed 220
255% 426 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 209%
WDC WD20EZRZ-00Z5HB0 120GB
110GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 149 149 149 150 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 394
Write 371
Mixed 330
SusWrite 182
72% 319 MB/s
4K Read 30.5
4K Write 75.5
4K Mixed 41.3
139% 49.1 MB/s
DQ Read 243
DQ Write 100
DQ Mixed 141
112% 161 MB/s
Poor: 85% Great: 91%
WD Green 500GB (2009)-$23
445GB free
Firmware: 01.00A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 95 96 97 97 95 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
54.2% Above average
Read 92.7
Write 92
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 96.2
64% 86.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 54%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$67
2TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 195 194 196 198 198 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
99% Outstanding
Read 151
Write 126
Mixed 79
SusWrite 194
101% 138 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 99%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905701-021.A00G 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
80.6% Excellent
MC Read 29
MC Write 31.1
MC Mixed 24.7
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 34.6
SC Mixed 26.2
74% 26.1 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B360 Pro4 Builds (Compare 671 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 53%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 45%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360 Pro4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $398
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback