TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock Z87 Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 33%
Sail boat
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics49.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z87 Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory17 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160412
Uptime8 Days
Run DateFeb 17 '23 at 05:06
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770K-$120
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
77.7% Very good
Memory 89.1
1-Core 100
2-Core 188
74% 126 Pts
4-Core 358
8-Core 548
56% 453 Pts
64-Core 560
35% 560 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑
This bench: 77.7%
 Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
Gigabyte(1458 367A)
CLim: 1519 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (57th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
49.4% Average
Lighting 60.4
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 0.2
49% 43.5 fps
MRender 65.7
Gravity 63
Splatting 56
50% 61.6 fps
Poor: 43% ↑
This bench: 49.4%
 Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX500 480GB-$38
176GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 0.9 116 64 3 149 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 387
Write 395
Mixed 4.7
SusWrite 98.7
49% 221 MB/s
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 35% Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
300GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 112 113 112 112 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Read 116
Write 122
Mixed 62
SusWrite 112
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑
This bench: 65.5%
 Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 0420 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 0420 F3-14900CL9-4GBXL 0420 F3-14900CL10-8GBXL 24GB
1867, 1867, 1867, 1867 MHz
4096, 8192, 4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.8% Good
MC Read 23.7
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20.1
65% 22.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 20.9
SC Mixed 21.6
57% 19.9 GB/s
Latency 68.4
58% 68.4 ns
Poor: 45% ↑
This bench: 64.8%
 Great: 72%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical Z87 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 929 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock Z87 Extreme4 - $224

CPU
Core i5-4670KIntel  $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples277x
Core i7-4770KIntel  $120Bench 74%, 172,887 samples245x
Core i7-4790KIntel  $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples115x
GPU
HD 4600 (Desktop 1.25 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 230,189 samples67x
GTX 970Nvidia  $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples61x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples59x
SSD
860 Evo 1TBSamsung  $140Bench 112%, 602,853 samples38x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung  $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples30x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples28x
RAM
BLS8G3D1609DS1S00. 2x8GBCrucialBench 55%, 48,796 samples29x
TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GBG.SKILLBench 67%, 24,592 samples23x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples22x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $441
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback