F-plus FLAPTOP i

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics10.3% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive188% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
16 months ago, 13 months ago.
SystemF-plus FLAPTOP i  (all builds)
MotherboardF-Plus f+ FLAPTOP I-SERIES
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221027
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateFeb 15 '23 at 20:41
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
56.3% Above average
Memory 41.3
1-Core 158
2-Core 243
77% 147 Pts
4-Core 383
8-Core 546
58% 464 Pts
64-Core 451
28% 451 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 56.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.1999
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10.3% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 17.1
Parallax 14.7
11% 15.1 fps
MRender 1.4
Gravity 16.6
Splatting 13.3
9% 10.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.3%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP1000F512G 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.25
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1097 1704 1359 1736 1674 1663 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
188% Outstanding
Read 638
Write 969
Mixed 730
SusWrite 1539
221% 969 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 37.3
129% 42.1 MB/s
DQ Read 814
DQ Write 491
DQ Mixed 93.3
220% 466 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 188%
Great: 313%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Shenzhen Longsys Electronics Co Ltd FD4AS3200CQGMZ 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
34.9% Below average
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 11.3
36% 12.7 GB/s
SC Read 6.9
SC Write 15.1
SC Mixed 7.6
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 196
20% 196 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 34.9%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical FLAPTOP i Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: F-plus FLAPTOP i

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback