HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8643
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210917
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 20:34
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3500-$140
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 79.1
1-Core 133
2-Core 256
86% 156 Pts
4-Core 511
8-Core 643
74% 577 Pts
64-Core 737
46% 737 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$195
PNY(196E 1347) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 528.49
Performing below potential (79th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.9% Very good
Lighting 91.5
Reflection 91.3
Parallax 83.7
75% 88.8 fps
MRender 111
Gravity 79.1
Splatting 71.8
70% 87.4 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,230
Write 918
Mixed 918
227% 1,022 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 166
4K Mixed 72.2
256% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 884
DQ Mixed 573
491% 713 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 190%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 131 131 126 113 113 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
60.1% Good
Read 87.5
Write 129
Mixed 85.9
SusWrite 122
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.6
93% 0.47 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN HMA81GU6CJR8N-XN 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
86.8% Excellent
MC Read 37.1
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 33.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 22.9
SC Mixed 30.5
74% 26 GB/s
Latency 82.3
49% 82.3 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.8%
Great: 87%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,089 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $440
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback