Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics8.65% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8ABB
Memory2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit farger
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221116
Uptime1 Days
Run DateMar 29 '23 at 11:40
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1235U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 1.3 GHz, turbo 0.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
49.5% Average
Memory 48.8
1-Core 83.4
2-Core 145
52% 92.5 Pts
4-Core 287
8-Core 299
39% 293 Pts
64-Core 380
24% 380 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
HP(103C 8ABB) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4032
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
8.65% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 13.9
Parallax 11.5
7% 11.4 fps
MRender 14.8
Gravity 17.2
Splatting 11.8
12% 14.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.65%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1006 256GB
168GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 298 233 207 167 185 183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
68% Good
Read 643
Write 344
Mixed 377
SusWrite 212
87% 394 MB/s
4K Read 18.9
4K Write 45.5
4K Mixed 18.5
76% 27.6 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 79.2
DQ Mixed 129
98% 136 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68%
Great: 190%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
88.8% Excellent
MC Read 37.4
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 34.4
103% 36.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 10.8
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 165
24% 165 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 88.8%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC Builds (Compare 332 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

System: HP EliteBook 840 14 inch G9 Notebook PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $340
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback