Csl-computer 908

Performance Results


Gaming 40% Jet ski	Desktop 79% Battleship	Workstation 33% Sail boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	46.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	80.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (35%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

15 months ago, 15 months ago.

System	Csl-computer 908 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK PRIME A320M-K
Memory	12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20211021
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Feb 11 '23 at 17:12
Run Duration	140 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	35%

Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 3 3200G-$75 104,122 User benchmarks, average bench 63% AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	68% Good	Memory 70.6 1-Core 109 2-Core 221 73% 134 Pts	4-Core 376 8-Core 388 51% 382 Pts	64-Core 358 22% 358 Pts
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 68% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$155 259,091 User benchmarks, average bench 43% MSI(1462 8D92) CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 3230 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.49 Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	46.5% Average	Lighting 57.4 Reflection 61.3 Parallax 54.8 47% 57.8 fps	MRender 68.2 Gravity 53.7 Splatting 49.7 46% 57.2 fps
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 46.5% Great: 46%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 77GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0BB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 235 266 268 267 267 MB/s Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	80.9% Excellent	Read 440 Write 428 Mixed 211 SusWrite 257 75% 334 MB/s	4K Read 26 4K Write 68.3 4K Mixed 27.3 110% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 348 DQ Write 283 DQ Mixed 85.4 127% 239 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 80.9% Great: 118%
Asmedia ASM1153E 500GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 36% 167GB free Firmware: 0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 35 36 36 36 36 MB/s Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	24.7% Poor	Read 50.2 Write 34.5 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 35.5 27% 36.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 1 177% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 24.7% Great: 62%
Generic Externa 320GB 41 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 57GB free Firmware: 0056 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 3,447 Mixed 35.3 1,246% 1,741 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.6 117% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 56%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston ACR32D4U2S8HD-8X 2x8GB 3,050 User benchmarks, average bench 88% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	98% Outstanding	MC Read 37.1 MC Write 37.5 MC Mixed 33.4 103% 36 GB/s	SC Read 22.8 SC Write 38.1 SC Mixed 26.4 83% 29.1 GB/s	Latency 100 40% 100 ns
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 98% Great: 103%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 908 Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 11%

Tree trunk

Desktop 66%

Battle cruiser

Workstation 10%

Tree trunk

System: Csl-computer 908

CPU
Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples	7x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon Vega 8 GraphicsAMDBench 10%, 115,953 samples	2x
GTX 560 TiNvidia $188Bench 16%, 42,397 samples	1x
GTX 770Nvidia $279Bench 34%, 116,895 samples	1x

SSD
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
PLUS 1000GBSandiskBench 44%, 44,528 samples	2x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	1x

RAM
DDR4 3200 1x8GBAdataBench 47%, 7,168 samples	2x
Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 1x16GBTeamBench 48%, 1,790 samples	1x
HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 2x8GBHynixBench 73%, 22,760 samples	1x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $127

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $168	Nvidia RTX 4070 $490	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16