Zoostorm 7200-5337A

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics50.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive54.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
16 months ago, 16 months ago.
SystemZoostorm 7200-5337A  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME H270-PRO
Memory14.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161122
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 11 '23 at 16:09
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.6% Very good
Memory 92.8
1-Core 102
2-Core 206
77% 133 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 379
50% 375 Pts
64-Core 385
24% 385 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 78.6%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
50.5% Above average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 58.5
Parallax 110
37% 71.2 fps
MRender 87.6
Gravity 96.8
Splatting 97.2
77% 93.9 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 600p Series NVMe PCIe M.2 128GB-$98
81GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PSF100C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 259 151 61 53 61 52 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
54.6% Above average
Read 604
Write 296
Mixed 327
SusWrite 106
74% 333 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 9.9
4K Mixed 11.7
59% 15.8 MB/s
DQ Read 138
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 21
51% 105 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 54.6%
Great: 107%
Seagate Momentus Thin 5400.9 2.5" 500GB-$21
466GB free
Firmware: 0001YAM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 103 103 98 100 98 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 100
Write 105
Mixed 49
SusWrite 101
65% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.6
100% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%
Kingston DT microDuo 3.0 32GB
24GB free, PID 16a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 98.4
Write 23.2
Mixed 35.9
53% 52.5 MB/s
4K Read 2.8
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.2
41% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 24%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
77% Very good
MC Read 29.6
MC Write 29.6
MC Mixed 23.9
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 22.5
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 62.4
64% 62.4 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 77%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 7200-5337A Builds (Compare 8 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

System: Zoostorm 7200-5337A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback